TWiki > DNA > DNASolution1 > DNASoln1Issue002 TWiki webs:
Main | TWiki | Know | Sandbox
DNA . { History of Changes | DNA Documents | Search | Go }
Back to DNA Solution1 Issue Tracker

Issue 2: Content of unicast RAs 

The draft currently says that negative acks (LNOLO) are not needed
for unicast RAs because they are unicast and there should be no
confusion, but ping-ponging could potentially cause a host to
receive an answer to an ealier question.

Should we include negative acks in uniast RA responses?

Discussion

Jim 

I think we ought to get rid of LNOLO altogether.

            jak

Brett 

I think we have resolution here too:

Brett Pentland wrote:

> The draft currently says that negative acks (LNOLO) are not needed
> for unicast RAs because they are unicast and there should be no
> confusion, but ping-ponging could potentially cause a host to
> receive an answer to an ealier question.
>
> Should we include negative acks in uniast RA responses?


Yes.

-- Main.BrettPentland - 18 Apr 2005

Back to DNA Issue Tracker Base Page

Topic DNASoln1Issue002 . { Edit | Attach | Ref-By | Printable | Diffs | r1.3 | > | r1.2 | > | r1.1 | More }
Revision r1.3 - 22 Apr 2005 - 02:17 GMT - Main.BrettPentland
Parents: WebHome > DNASolution1 		Copyright © 1999-2003 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback.